Green_landlord
12-17-2007, 03:05 PM
I received notice from my tenant that they were moving out of the home and giving essentially 2 days notice. I received both verbal and written confirmation. The tenant moved out on Sept 4th (3 months early) and asked I apply their security deposit for August rent since they never paid it. They stated I mis-represented the home prior to signing the rental agreement and as a result they are terminating the lease. In the following 2 weeks the tenant verbally acknowledged the house was not at fault but rather he was on the verge of bankruptcy and moved his family to a cheaper home (1 block away). During this conversation the tenant agreed to fix all damage that was above normal wear and tear and perform additional work to help work off his debt from the lease agreement. The tenant kept possession of the home for the ensuing two months making slow progress but only addressing things above normal wear and tear. During this time we put the house up for sale and prepared to market it for sale.
After approximately two months the tenant stated that he was to busy to perform any additional work on the house and he would hand over the keys, which he did. ( Approximately 1 month after receiving this notice I assembled a complete list of items above reasonable wear and tear including back rent and sent it to him on Dec 1st. He replied on Dec 6th that he was denying all charges and reiterated he moved out due to my misrepresentation of the house.
My question is: Can I still sue him for back rent and damages? I am unclear when he actually relinquished possession and when I needed to send him a listing of damages within the 30 day period. Additionally, does the 30 day clause apply since he forfeited his deposit in lieu of back rent for the month of Aug? Lastly, if I did send the notice to late can I still sue for back rent and what kind of proof would I need to supply to prove my court case? He alleges that water seeps in the basement during heavy rains (which is true) and I failed to disclose this (which is false because I did disclose this verbally and in writing in the form of a residential disclosure). He also states that a rain storm that occured on 8/30/07 was the tipping point to move, however he signed his new rental agreement before this date and had started moving out 2 days later.
Any advice people can provide would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
After approximately two months the tenant stated that he was to busy to perform any additional work on the house and he would hand over the keys, which he did. ( Approximately 1 month after receiving this notice I assembled a complete list of items above reasonable wear and tear including back rent and sent it to him on Dec 1st. He replied on Dec 6th that he was denying all charges and reiterated he moved out due to my misrepresentation of the house.
My question is: Can I still sue him for back rent and damages? I am unclear when he actually relinquished possession and when I needed to send him a listing of damages within the 30 day period. Additionally, does the 30 day clause apply since he forfeited his deposit in lieu of back rent for the month of Aug? Lastly, if I did send the notice to late can I still sue for back rent and what kind of proof would I need to supply to prove my court case? He alleges that water seeps in the basement during heavy rains (which is true) and I failed to disclose this (which is false because I did disclose this verbally and in writing in the form of a residential disclosure). He also states that a rain storm that occured on 8/30/07 was the tipping point to move, however he signed his new rental agreement before this date and had started moving out 2 days later.
Any advice people can provide would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks