ohiolandlord
03-13-2007, 11:28 AM
see attached pdf
In this case before the Franklin County Municipal Court, the matter started out as an eviction filed by the landlord against a month to month tenant. Though the tenant had sent in his rent for August 2006 by certified mail, return receipt requested, the landlord had refused to claim it, and the letter containing the check for August rent was returned to the tenant unopened.
The landlord filed an eviction action, asserting failure to pay the rent for August 2006 as the cause, and a second claim for relief for money damages. The tenant showed up at the eviction hearing and returned possession to the landlord, taking the position that the landlord’s filing of the eviction action while the tenant was not in breach of the lease agreement was a breach of the lease agreement by the landlord and thus ending the obligation to pay on the lease.
The cause of action for possession was dismissed by the Court as moot (the tenant having moved out and given up possession, the court will not award possession to a landlord who already has it) and all that was left of the case was the landlord’s claim against the tenant for unpaid rent and damages.
The tenant filed an Answer and Counterclaim against the landlord asserting claims for relief for breach of contract and for wrongful withholding of the security deposit in violation of Ohio Revised Code Section 5321.16. The decision will describe the fun from there….
In this case before the Franklin County Municipal Court, the matter started out as an eviction filed by the landlord against a month to month tenant. Though the tenant had sent in his rent for August 2006 by certified mail, return receipt requested, the landlord had refused to claim it, and the letter containing the check for August rent was returned to the tenant unopened.
The landlord filed an eviction action, asserting failure to pay the rent for August 2006 as the cause, and a second claim for relief for money damages. The tenant showed up at the eviction hearing and returned possession to the landlord, taking the position that the landlord’s filing of the eviction action while the tenant was not in breach of the lease agreement was a breach of the lease agreement by the landlord and thus ending the obligation to pay on the lease.
The cause of action for possession was dismissed by the Court as moot (the tenant having moved out and given up possession, the court will not award possession to a landlord who already has it) and all that was left of the case was the landlord’s claim against the tenant for unpaid rent and damages.
The tenant filed an Answer and Counterclaim against the landlord asserting claims for relief for breach of contract and for wrongful withholding of the security deposit in violation of Ohio Revised Code Section 5321.16. The decision will describe the fun from there….